Saturday, April 11, 2009

Even more interesting news regarding Sprint, Blackberries and MMS

A user on the Crackberry Forums recently posted about how his Blackberry Curve phone was getting embedded pictures when receiving MMS.  For awhile a lot of people thought this user was trolling as other users were claiming this without providing us any evidence.

Well user asdf002 wasn't lying.  In fact he/she posted pictures as well as a YouTube video showing the embedded picture in the message.

Comes out user asdf002 has the Blackberry Curve 8330m.  You might be asking yourself what's new or different with this model vs the regular 8330 model?  Not much really.  The main differentiation is that the 8330m models use MEID (Mobile Equipment Identifier) instead of ESN (Electronic Serial Number).

With this 8330m, it enabled Sprint to easily identify the newer model blackberries and push out the service books that enabled incoming MMS.  Now granted this isn't "true MMS" as the pictures are still running through Sprint's picture mail servers.  User jverity on the BuzzAboutWireless forums said:
It is not True MMS.  It just gets delivered to the phone directly.  It is still going through a Pic Mail server.  This is provable by the fact that even those people who are getting direct delivery can still go to the pic mail site and see the message they just received.  The complaints I have gathered from all these threads are as follows, in what I think is the order of importance:

  1. Delivery method - Having to go to the website to pick up the MMS.

  2. Outages - When the pic mail servers are down (which happens way more often than other carrier's MMS outages) you still do not get your message.

  3. Delivery delay - Going through the pic mail servers delays reception between 30 seconds to 5 minutes when compared to any other carrier.

  4. Certain message types do not come through properly because of the way the pic mail server handles them.

  5. Certain images have their quality downgraded by the pic mail server, supposedly because it is trying to save storage space.

  6. Your media is stored indefinitely on a server that has been hacked before and there are still instructions out there on the internet on how to break in to other peoples accounts.



Regardless of the fact that it's not true MMS, it might as well be the same thing.  For me the important thing was actually receiving the pictures directly to your phone − without having to jump through hoops.

I posted on the BuzzAboutWireless forums asking if it were possible for us early adopters to have our phones SKU manually reactivated or refreshed on their network so that the network would see our phones the same way the 8330m phones but it doesn't seem possible .  Sprint employee halcyoncmdr replied to my question bascially saying "No that won't work" and gave his reason why:
No, the SKU itself on the new devices is different. The 8330m is entered into the system separately than the regular 8330. If you have an original 8330 then you will have what all the other 8330 users have. If you happen to have an 8330m then you get the newer experience receiving the picture directly because that is how the network sees it, separately from the original 8330s.

Despite people claiming that corporate customers won't be affected, the fact is they will be. If they are used to a specific system, changing that system will adversely affect them, even if you believe the Picture Mail system is inferior. Changing the system when they are used to it will change the way things work.

Lets be realistic here, if a corporation using Microsoft Windows discovers that their systems are vulnerable to some exploit, they wouldn't ignore it, they'd upgrade or patch their systems to avoid it.  The same rule should apply with the MMS changes here.  These changes most certainly would benefit the corporate customers in the long run; but I think what it comes down to is that Sprint doesn't want to devote anymore money or manpower then necessary dealing with the situation, seeing as they're hemorrhaging at this time.

With the backlash and endless threats Sprint has received from their Blackberry community regarding their shitty Picture Mail service, you can only pray they won't make the same mistake again.  The highly anticipated Palm Pre phone which is expected sometime before the 2nd quarter of this year claims it will have MMS capabilities but I have to wonder if that will actually be "true MMS" or not.  Seeing as Sprint has a reputation for leaving their customers high and dry, it doesn't look promising for the Pre community as well.

We shall see.

Sources:

Friday, April 10, 2009

Acer Aspire One AOD150 Netbook Unboxing

[caption id="attachment_1933" align="alignright" width="270" caption="This is the Acer Aspire One AOD150 Sapphire Blue Netbook"]This is the Acer Aspire One AOD150 Sapphire Blue Netbook[/caption]

Sorry for the lack of updates.. I haven't had much time to post here because I've been busy capturing video and writing scripts for future videos on Mitalis.com.  I'd like to make it up to you with another video.  I recently purchased an Acer Aspire One AOD150 10.1" Netbook from Amazon.com as I wanted something small, portable, and lightweight that I could access the internet on.

Here's some technical information about the Acer Aspire One Netbook that I bought:

  • 1.6GHz Intel Atom N270 Processor 533FSB

  • 160GB SATA Hard Drive 5400RPM

  • 1GB DDR2 533 SDRAM (I upgraded to 2GB)

  • WSVGA 10.1" screen (1024x600) w/ CrystalBrite Technology (LED backlit)

  • Integrated Graphics Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 (256MB ram reserved for video)

  • Windows XP Home Edition

  • Multi-in-One card reader

  • Built in microphone & CrystalEye Webcam

  • 6-cell battery providing up to 6 1/2 hours of battery life


You can find out more information about the Acer Netbooks at www.acer.com (click on Netbooks) or www.amazon.com (keyword AOC150)

In this video, I do an unboxing of my netbook as well as show you how to upgrade its RAM.

[flashvideo file=http://mitalis-videos.s3.amazonaws.com/netbook-unboxing.flv width=423 height=338 /]

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Adblock Plus Filter maintainer dies aged 56

[caption id="attachment_1904" align="alignright" width="230" caption="Richard J. Petnel - maintanied a filter called EasyList designed for the Adblock Plus Firefox plugin"]easylist[/caption]

Richard J. Petnel passed away last Friday, April 3, 2009 at St. Peter's Hospice inn after having a brief illness.  It has not been disclosed as to what illness he died from exactly.

Rick was well known on the internet for his work, he spent a great deal of time maintaining his Ad Block Plus filter webpage: http://easylist.adblockplus.org

So what's going to happen with the Adblock lists?  Well on the Adblock Plus blog, it was announced that user Ares2 will be taking over Easylists.  Ares2 had been maintaining a German complementary subscription for Easylists, but will also be filling the shoes of Petnel.

If you'd like to leave a message to Petnel's family, you can do so here: www.NewcomerAlbany.com

Source:

Why Mitalis loves YouTube

The video clip speaks for itself.  Just watch...

[flashvideo file=http://mitalis-videos.s3.amazonaws.com/nerdy-youtube-kid.flv width=432 height=336 /]

Taglines don't make crappy movies better

Came across this on the internet for the upcoming Crank 2: High Voltage movie, I couldn't help but share because at least the graffiti on the picture is probably telling the truth.  But hey, I still have plans watching it... Why?  Because I know what to expect when I walk in to see this.   It's your typical Jason Statham movie...

Crank II Tagline

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Time Warner Cable to start screwing you over with bandwidth caps

[caption id="attachment_1863" align="alignright" width="180" caption="Time Warner is putting forth an anti-competitive strategy that screws everybody over except themselves."]A typical rendition of a rich businessman doing whatever it takes so they don't get screwed over.[/caption]

Early last year, Time Warner announced that it planned to set up bandwidth cap trials. Sixteen months later, they're moving forward with this trial and will be testing these caps in four new cities.  The four new cities where Time Warner will be screwing over their customers over will be:

  • Rochester, NY

  • Austin, TX

  • San Antonio, TX

  • Greensboro, NC


What's interesting is Time Warner doesn't have other ISPs to deal with in these cities that offer competitive speed in broadband service.

CEO of Time Warner Glenn Britt said an in interview:
We need a viable model to be able to support the infrastructure of the broadband business.  We made a mistake early by not defining our business based on the consumption dimension.

Essentially what he's saying is that their existing flat-rate pricing model isn't "viable" enough to fund their infrastructure upgrades, despite the company being very profitable.  The company has other niche ways to make money by doing things like DNS redirection advertising, where if somebody mistakenly types in a wrong domain, they'll see ads come up on that page with similar domain names and suggestions of domain names that closely match what they probably meant to type.

In truth, the real purpose of this bandwidth cap is to allow them to take control of Internet Video.  The idea of charging customers more money for the exact same service, especially now with video sites like YouTube and Hulu that offer HD video clearly poses a huge threat to their TV business.  Time Warner's investors also pressured them to go this route.

The most ridiculous thing about this whole cap is the lack of bandwidth they're making available for their audience.  Time Warner wants to set a cap ranging between 5GB to 40GB.  If you're a subscriber to Netflix's HD streaming package, you could easily exceed 50GB in less then a week.  Their plan is to charge you $1 extra for every gig of bandwidth you go over.  A 40GB cap is extremely low, even Comcrap...err Comcast has a 250GB cap which is 6 times more then the max of what Time Warner offers.

I stumbled across this website: 'DropTimeWarnerCable.com' that lists common internet activities that could easily exceed their monthly 40GB cap:

  • Downloading game demos

  • Download your purchased steam games

  • Download music via iTunes

  • Backing up personal websites

  • Uploading videos to YouTube

  • Watching YouTube videos

  • Keeping our Dropbox synced

  • Stream video from Hulu/Vimeo/Netflix

  • Update operating system with drivers/service packs

  • Office networking between multiple branches

  • Remote Desktop Access, Online Gaming, Downloading Linux Distros, School Lectures

  • Backing up full resolution photos from my 8GB flash card to my online storage account.

  • Streaming music from Pandora

  • Uploading large amounts of pictures (20+ mega pixel pr. image) for sharing with friends on my personal website

  • Stream video with grandma so she can see her grand kids

  • World of Warcraft

  • Skype / VoIP

  • Downloading scientific data for research

  • Web seminars, web meetings


Other ISPs like Verizon FIOS (where available) offers very competitive speeds at a competitive price, and a much better package, also did I mention they don't rip you off by throwing in a bandwidth cap?

The decisions they're making  are outrageous and monopolistic.  Time Warner has no competition to deal with which is exactly why they're doing this crap, leaving the residents of those cities little to no choice when it comes to ISP selection.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all against businesses making money.  However, when you do something where it's obviously anti-competitive against other businesses, that's where I see it as the company being GREEDY.  These online video websites offer a new business model that goes against the archaic business model of Time Warner.  The most logical way to handle this situation is for Time Warner to change their business strategy and offer something better or unique for the customer rather then taking a sledgehammer and screwing everybody over.  Their current strategy really leaves the taste of barf in my mouth.

I hope to god there's a class action lawsuit against Time Warner.  Legislation needs to be passed because these sort of business not only hurts everybody in the long run, but it creates a huge obstacle when it comes to internet evolution.

Sources: